Language: EN PL DE FR ES NL
🔥 Hot Deals
5 Eyes, 9 Eyes, 14 Eyes
VPNHotDeals.com Editorial Team · March 2, 2026

5 Eyes, 9 Eyes,
14 Eyes
— VPN Jurisdiction Guide 2026

These intelligence alliances share surveillance data between member countries. If your VPN is headquartered in a 5 Eyes country, it could be legally compelled to hand over your data. Here's what it means for VPN choice.

✍ VPNHotDeals.com Editorial Team📅 March 2, 2026⏱ 7 min read
Global VPN server network 111 countries — VPNHotDeals.com
📷 VPNHotDeals.com editorial team · independent test · March 2026
What are the alliances

5 Eyes, 9 Eyes, 14 Eyes — Explained

These are intelligence-sharing agreements between countries that allow member governments to share surveillance data with each other. The key implication for VPN users: if a VPN is based in a member country, authorities could compel it to hand over user data — and share that data with allied nations.

AllianceMembersRisk for VPN Users
5 Eyes🇺🇸 USA · 🇬🇧 UK · 🇨🇦 Canada · 🇦🇺 Australia · 🇳🇿 New ZealandHighest — full intelligence sharing, strongest legal compulsion
9 Eyes5 Eyes + 🇩🇰 Denmark · 🇫🇷 France · 🇳🇱 Netherlands · 🇳🇴 NorwayElevated — secondary sharing partners
14 Eyes9 Eyes + 🇩🇪 Germany · 🇧🇪 Belgium · 🇮🇹 Italy · 🇸🇪 Sweden · 🇪🇸 SpainModerate — tertiary sharing, less active
Outside🇵🇦 Panama · 🇨🇭 Switzerland · 🇧🇻 British Virgin Islands · 🇮🇸 IcelandLowest — no obligation to share, strong privacy laws
VPN headquarters comparison

Where Are VPNs Based?

VPNJurisdictionAlliancePrivacy Risk
NordVPN🇵🇦 PanamaNone✅ Low — outside all alliances
ProtonVPN🇨🇭 SwitzerlandNone✅ Low — Swiss neutrality, no EU sharing
ExpressVPN🇻🇬 British Virgin IslandsNone✅ Low — British Overseas Territory, separate laws
Mullvad🇸🇪 Sweden14 Eyes⚠️ Member, but no-logs proven in 2023 police raid
Surfshark🇳🇱 Netherlands9 Eyes⚠️ Member, but no-logs verified by Deloitte
CyberGhost🇷🇴 RomaniaNone✅ Low — Romania not in any alliance
💡
Important nuance: Jurisdiction matters, but it's only one factor. A VPN with zero logs in a 14 Eyes country (like Mullvad in Sweden) is effectively safer than a VPN with poor no-logs practices outside the alliances. A verified no-logs policy beats favorable jurisdiction every time.
Bottom line

Does Jurisdiction Really Matter?

Jurisdiction matters but it's not the whole picture. Here's a realistic view:

  • A no-logs VPN outside 5 Eyes is ideal — NordVPN (Panama), ProtonVPN (Switzerland), ExpressVPN (BVI) tick this box.
  • A no-logs VPN inside 5 Eyes is still safe — if the no-logs policy is independently audited. With nothing stored, there's nothing to hand over regardless of jurisdiction.
  • Jurisdiction protects against mass surveillance — if your government is a 5 Eyes member and wants broad access to VPN data, a VPN outside the alliance can legally refuse.
  • No jurisdiction protects against your own mistakes — logging into personal accounts, browser fingerprinting, and cookie tracking bypass VPN jurisdiction entirely.

Not necessarily. If the VPN has a verified no-logs policy (audited by an independent firm), there's no data to share even if compelled. NordVPN (Panama) is outside 5 Eyes AND audited — best of both worlds.

Panama (NordVPN), Switzerland (ProtonVPN), British Virgin Islands (ExpressVPN), and Iceland are considered the most privacy-friendly jurisdictions — strong privacy laws, outside intelligence alliances.

Poland is not a member of the 5 Eyes, 9 Eyes, or 14 Eyes alliances. Polish residents have relatively good jurisdictional protection — and Polish law doesn't require VPNs to retain user logs.

The Netherlands is a 9 Eyes member. However, Surfshark's no-logs policy was verified by Deloitte in 2023. A law enforcement request would yield zero user data regardless of the Dutch legal framework.